Those looking into some catalyst might want to
ponder over these names for the week. I have done research on few of them, the
other I have read online on Barron’s and other publications.
Ciena Corporation (CIEN): Growing demand for data, leading to growing demand for optical network equipment and infrastructure leaders will help the company grow and perform well in the future.Will likely benefit from its partnership with Verizon, AT&T as they start t accelerate the roll out of 100G technologies. VZ is currently field testing a new technology from CIEN that allows use of specialized software to increase spectral efficiency of the networks - doubling the capacity of its 100G network. Could also be a future takeout candidate.
Berry Plastics Group (BERY): Makes plastic containers and drinking cups,
including a cup made of a biodegradable plastic it calls Versalite. Styrofoam
cups aren't biodegradable, and paper cups aren't optimal for holding hot
liquids; the company was taken private in a leveraged buyout by Apollo Global
Mgt, and came public again in Oct-12. It generates $2 a share in fcf, and is
paying down debt. Shares trade for $21. If nothing happens, you could make 11%
just by deleveraging. But revenue are expected to grow.
Valero Energy (VLO): VLO operates as an independent petroleum refining
and marketing company. VLO recently spun off its its retail operations. Makes one
of every 4 barrels of product exported from US. It’s a play on refining. With
WTI-Brent spread bet. $5 -$8 it’s easier to make products here and export them.
The company did well over the financial crises. Furthermore, future crack
spreads are suppose to move higher, leading to higher operating margins. Stock traded
in the 45, 10x earnings and a 2% dividend yield.
International Game Technology (IGT) – The story for this firm is interesting. IGT purchased an Internet gaming
company, DoubleDown. DoubleDown since then has come to dominate the
social-gaming vertical of the Internet. DoubleDown is highly profitable and
growing very rapidly. DoubleDown is close to generating $ 100m of OCF; applying
valuation standards this alone could be valued at excess of $ 1.5bn. IGT sells
at around 7x CF with other parts of IGT valued between 4x to 5x OCF. IGT
generates stable cash-flow growth, has 20%+ operating margins and ROE of 25%+,;
ideally giving it a valuation of 10x to 11x instead of the current 7x. IGT just
did another $ 200m buyback. The traditional slots business is a mature
business, probably 2% to 3% growth in the U.S. The combination of everything is
on the order of 8% growth and operating cash flow; extraordinarily high growth
in free cash flow; the ability to buy shares at an attractive price; a decent
dividend; and perhaps a transaction. William Hill (WIMHY)—a gaming company is
large enough and has a high-enough stock-market value to buy IGT. It has been expanding in the U.S. and is now
licensed in almost all of the important gaming venues, and so that particular
barrier that used to exist with IGT isn't as significant as it used to be. On SOTP
the firm should be valued atleast 50% higher than it is right now.
Take-Two (TTWO) - The intersection of consumer electronics and
non-casino gaming is a major growth industry globally, and investors undervalue
the power of growth of this immersive gaming. Immersive games is very difficult
business to get into—you can make a very nice return, and right now, the
company that does a good job of this and happens to be very undervalued is TTWO.
In addition to creating games, TTWO has been very aggressive in acquiring its
stock. The principal asset of Take-Two is Grand Theft Auto. GTA comes out every
5 yrs and each time a new version is released, the cash flow of this game is
more significant than it was the previous time. It is very clear the cash flow
from the latest edition of Grand Theft Auto—GTA 5—is going to be over $ 500m
during its 5 yr lifetime, and that's $100m a year. At a CF multiple of 10x puts GTA value around $1bn; that's more or less the entire value of
TTWO. Anything else is a bonus for shareholders. Stock should be worth $22 to
$23.
Nestlé:
The world's largest food outfit has one of its industry's best growth outlooks,
thanks to a big presence in the developing world. The Swiss company aims for
5%-6% annual organic sales growth, and it should come close to hitting that
target this year. Analysts believe that Nestlé is capable of high single-digit
yearly gains in earnings per share. Nestlé's U.S.-listed shares, at around $72,
fetch about 17 times estimated 2014 profits and yield 2%. Nestlé isn't cheap,
but it rarely is a bargain, because of the strength of its global portfolio,
which includes candy, coffee, bottled water, ice cream, infant formula, and pet
food. It owns almost 30% of cosmetics maker L'Oréal, a stake worth $30 billion.
Excluding that, Nestlé trades at only a small premium to slower-growing U.S. food
outfits like General Mills (GIS) and Kellogg (K).
Unit (UNT): The company is in the business of contract drilling, exploration and
production, and midstream services in the oil and gas industry. New Mountain Vantage which owns 5.2% of UNT has
had discussions with management regarding its corporate structure, capital
allocation, maximizing the value of the midstream division, board structure,
and management compensation. The fund bought the shares at an average cost of $45.99.
UNT’s midstream business grew 35% this year. New Mountain is an active
shareholder that is very engaged with management, but most of the time
privately. It believes that UNT is trading at a large discount to the sum of
its parts. While UNT is primarily an exploration and production business, its
midstream business has been growing and has a good management team that can
continue growth by competing for larger jobs and entering into strategic
transactions. Soon it will make a lot of sense to do something strategic with
the midstream business. The company trades at less than 5x Ebitda, which is low
even for pure E&P businesses. Midstream businesses trade at double-digit
multiples. A separation of the two businesses could ultimately be beneficial to
both. New Mountain has a constructive relationship with management and is
likely to support them and work with them to enhance shareholder value. But, if
need be, as it has shown in the past, it has the experience and conviction to
follow through on a proxy fight
No comments:
Post a Comment